|
What does today‘s manufacturer want to achieve? How can I help?
Today’s manufacturer is evolving into not only a source of products but of information. The requirements are:
- Retail execution
- Productivity and business process
- Shelf visibility and data sharing
These key deliverables have to be collected by either manufacturers themselves or by trusted partners. This information is only as good as its management however — “If it can be measured, it can be managed”. Manufacturers are not in it alone obviously and everyone in the supply chain is seeking trustworthy and reciprocal partners to share information with. The goal? Getting the right product to the right customer at the right time.
If (manufacturers who utilize Direct Store Delivery) improved their inventory and order management abilities, an additional 14 minutes/store can be saved and used for merchandising activities.
By allowing your field staff to have some data visibility, they become much more powerful in pricing, merchandising, products in the pipeline, promotions, etc… In fact, an additional 4% revenue growth due to fewer opportunities missed, 5–6 times more new product sales and better store compliance with pricing, plan–o–grams and promotions. Imagine how sharing data between supply chain partners would benefit!
Your field rep morale and enhanced customer satisfaction as a result of the automation of tasks and enhanced field instructions and best practices.¹
Talk further about Retail Execution. Today‘s manufacturers certainly pay a lot of attention to their plant operations and upstream supply chain — what about the window between product arrival at the store and collecting POS data?
Manufacturers are losing sight of their products once they arrive at the store. After delivery, many manufacturers simply wait for POS data to show them how things are going. Data based on quantity and not quality is not enough any more. Manufacturers are certainly aware of the need for retail compliance and execution, but they are severely lacking in regard to customer–centric data gathering. Auditing remains an important aspect to ensuring services levels are achieved, but more customer interaction is the key.
Manufacturers now understand that the store itself is the new media. There has been an explosion of new item introductions, out of stocks (OOSs), missing items and confounding item assortments that have frustrated consumers and their ability to buy what they desire. The out of stocks are no longer solely high velocity items, but includes also “voids” or items that should be in the store but are not. Voids and OOSs in total are running 10–20% of all items — Focus on the must have stores.²
The biggest challenge by far is effective retail execution, cited by 53% of (manufacturer) respondents. This is one area that will require true collaboration between retail and supplier trading partners, particularly to avoid the finger–pointing that often occurs when something goes wrong.³
You mentioned Business Process: What challenges are emerging in light of the mandate for Retail Execution?
Definite challenges exist for manufacturers and retailers alike to deliver upon the new promises being made to customers. At the basic level, many manufacturers alone simply do not have the business process experience to hit the ground running and solve customer problems. Retail partners can assist here again. Timely insight to what is happening at the shelf, outsourcing (or not) category needs and being able to run exception based reports from the collected data are some of the outstanding challenges. Supply chain partners need to determine who is responsible for what, how it is to be delivered and to measure the results. Caution must be taken to not duplicate efforts.
Challenges existing for manufacturers:
31% — Named lack of business processes as a challenge;
31% — Named lack of timely visibility into product movement to the shelf;
28% — Cited high supply costs;
25% — Said supply chain inability to execute at a more granular level;
25% — Named culture change challenges;
22% — Cited organizational changes.³
Do you outsource your (manufacturer) category analytics needs?
43% — No, entirely internal, done by Category Teams;
27% — No, entirely internal, done by Business Intelligence / Strategy Team;
14% — Other;
11% — Yes, to analytics service providers;
5% — Yes, to vendors of syndicated data source.³
At what stage are you (manufacturers) in the adoption of visibility and exception management tools?
24% — Don’t know/Can’t answer;
20% — Fully Deployed;
20% — No Plans;
16% — Evaluating;
12% — Piloting;
7% — Initial Rollout;
2% — Upgrading.4
So Sharing Data is the final key. What does today’s snapshot of trading relationships look like?
Large manufacturers already provide a lot of data to retailers by way of category management; however the smaller the supplier, the less information they collect. That data is focused on their categories or products and becomes disjointed at retail when looking at the big picture. Reciprocally, manufacturers receive POS data but this time the smaller picture is missing: The individual customer. These manufacturer and retailer partners must act together to obtain, cleanse, unify and measure customer data in a timely fashion to fully capitalize on the opportunity before them.
…the challenge on the supplier side is gathering, cleansing and normalizing the huge volume of POS data and then turning that data into insights that can be acted upon.³
From a Category Management standpoint, what role do you play with the majority of your retail customers?
39% — Regularly provide insights to support own brands;
31% — Category Captain proving category level insights;
15% — Occasionally provide insights to support own brands.
7% — Rarely provide insights to support own brands.
8% — Other.³
When asked what the most important factor to a successful working relationship was,
36% — Cited collaborative business planning. Suppliers want to engage with retailers up front to initiate and execute on strategies…³
To what degree do the following challenge your company’s (manufacturers) ability to collaborate with its trading partners?
79% — Limited external resources and support form our trading partners;
69% — Limited internal resources and support;
66% — Access to timely, relevant data from out trading partners;
60% — Conflicting and/or misaligned goals between manufacturers and retailers;
55% — Lack of technologies and tools that supports collaboration efforts.4
Industry Stats
Best in class manufacturers achieve:
76% — Gained improvement in frequency of out of stocks within last 2 years;
79% — Average forecast accuracy at product family level;
43% — Ability to reduce the time from demand sensing to taking action.5
At what stage are you (manufacturers) in the adoption of visibility and exception management tool
24% — Don’t know/Can’t answer;
20% — Fully Deployed;
20% — No Plans;
16% — Evaluating;
12% — Piloting;
7% — Initial Rollout;
2% — Upgrading.4
An information gap exists today between product arrival at the store and the point of sale. Mantis from Metaworks is focused on retail execution and helps bridge the gap of missing information that is so needed right now.
Call for further information:
Jim Dorey Manager, Product Marketing 877–265–0075 x25
1 GMA–McKinsey Customer & Channel Marketing Survey — 2005
2 NARMS 2007 Return On Investment Study
3 Customer–Centric Merchandising — Consumer Goods Technology, November 2006
4 Forrester Research, Integrated Sales, Inventory and Operations Planning — June 2007
5 Aberdeen Group, Automated Task Management — July 2007
|